Poetry Foundation
Poetry Magazine
January 2009
Poems by C.K. Williams, Kim Addonizio, Anne Winters; previously unpublished Langston Hughes, introduced by Arnold Rampersad; Michael Hofmann on Bishop and Lowell. More
Harriet

Alan Gilbert
Things I’ve learned while blogging for Harriet . . .

—that blogging is hard work

I have a new respect for people who blog every day. I’m a regular reviewer of art and literature for a variety of publications, and during busy periods I sometimes have a deadline a week. Yet even this doesn’t compare to the rigors of having something intelligent and coherent (not that I always succeeded) to post to Harriet circa every three days—during the easily distracting summer months, no less.

—that bloggers start to repeat themselves

It’s inevitable that the amount of content coming in might begin to lag behind the amount of content going out. It happened to me a couple times during the past three months. Though that’s no excuse for Ron Silliman to continue willfully employing the category “School of Quietude.”

—that I still worry whether blogging is a distraction from “real” writing

I’m not a snob, and I enjoy reading all kinds of writing, but I’m not entirely certain that blogging isn’t a diversion from the primary writing one does. For instance, Dodie Bellamy recently started a blog that has already become one of my favorites, but I’m worried it means that she won’t be writing as much of her amazing fiction.

—that blogging is good for the résumé

I told a friend of mine that I was blogging for Harriet this summer and he remarked that he’s seen an increase in job descriptions for writing positions in academia that ask for blogging experience.

—that I’m as comfortable with Mark Nowak’s historical materialism as Linh Dinh’s cultural materialism

Does that make me a third-wayer? I hope not.

—that Lucia Perillo’s images of her dog and senior citizens volleyball were as fun as any visual art I saw this summer

I enjoyed reading her posts too! And her excellent book of poems Luck Is Luck.

—that D.A. Powell’s “Conceptual Poetics: A Practicum” was one of my favorite posts of the summer

By the way, I rarely read in bed (bed is for two things), but Powell’s book of poems Cocktails is great bed reading. I never really got with John Ashbery’s poems until I heard him give a poetry reading; then I realized that his work is more avuncular uncle than cagey and wry experimentalist. Relatedly, I imagine the poems in Cocktails whispered in my ear by a martini-sipping vegan vampire. Given his post on Tennessee cuisine, I’m guessing Powell isn’t a vegan.

—that Travis Nichols looks and blogs like a 21st-century poetry-world version of Mercury

At least from his Harriet author photo and the way many of his posts served as dispatches and messages. I imagine him wiry and quick with casual footwear. I mean this as a compliment—in my previous post, I argued for fast poetry.

—that I regret not writing an entry responding to Reginald Shepherd’s deeply thoughtful posts

I had fully intended to, and took some notes, but his most serious posts deserved essays in response, and I felt as if some of my own posts were already too formal and long (cursed grad school education!). I wish him the absolutely speediest and fullest recovery. I’ve always paid attention to his work, and will do so even more after directly encountering the seriousness of his commitment to poetry.

—that I appreciate what Foetry.com did, even if it could have done it smarter

I’ve been around the poetry world long enough to realize that it’s no more democratic or equitable than the rest of the world. In my mind, that’s where the relationship between politics and poetry should start.

—that my posts on poetry and politics and poetry and hip-hop generated the most responses

Whereas the two I wrote on “My top three favorite poetry readings, like, ever!” (Part I and Part II) instigated a total of one response. I imagined that those two posts would generate a potentially endless string of comments by Harriet readers describing their own favorite poetry readings, and that I would vie for the honor of having written the most popular Harriet entry ever! Instead, I ended up looking a little bit like Han Solo in Star Wars when he hypes a jump to light speed only to push the throttle and have nothing happen.

—that Harriet’s readership is diverse, interesting, and engaged

When Harriet’s editors contacted me about blogging for the site, the thing that ultimately made me decide to do it was the web traffic estimates they quoted me. What an amazing opportunity to talk poetry with such a wide audience. It turned out to be true, as well as the most gratifying part of the experience. Thank you. May the dialogue become only more expansive.

08.31.08 | Comments (4)



Comments


Dear Alan,

This is a very kind and thoughtful goodbye post--and in those ways seems characteristic of all of your posts here at Harriet, which I have enjoyed reading immensely. I very much enjoy this blog, not only for the great posts and discussions and the things it gets me thinking about vis a vis writing, but also because it introduces me, via the rotating sequence of bloggers, to writers whose work I wasn't always very familiar with. If those writers' posts are smart and funny and patient and generous and compelling (phew!) I usually end up seeking out their work. I did so with you, and am really glad I did. I think I googled your name with the word "poem" and the link (http://phillysound.blogspot.com/2004_10_01_archive.html) (one must scroll down) I ended up clicking on contained your really smart and complex answers to some difficult (at least difficult to inhabit) questions like: "Does having strong political values and strong aesthetic values cause conflicts in your poetry?" and "You are a poet and a critic. How closely are poetry and criticism related for you and your writing in both genres?"

Plus, you also said: "I imagine that it sucks to be “a big plastic bucket full of frogs at the market” " which would have won me over if I hadn't been already. I'm really looking forward to reading your book Another Future: Poetry and Art in a Postmodern Twilight.

Re: your surprise that no one replied to those posts you had prepared that you thought would be the most generative--your "My Favorite Poetry Readings" posts--it *is* kind of surprising. I follow many of the comments threads here and it does often seem like people are most compelled to write in when they want to argue, not when they want to express agreement or enthusiasm. (I was once or twice guilty of this myself--and then I was really embarrassed and like, "why am I being such a bitch about this blogger's take on the lyric I? I certainly wouldn't argue this way in person!" (Then I sincerely apologized to Ange :-) , and stopped posting under a pseudonym (which doesn't (and who cares) make my identity any more discernible or important but somehow makes me feel more accountable for/ aware of what I say. Minding my manners as mama would say.)

For the record, my favorite poetry readings--if I think about that, I tend for some reason to think in terms of poetry readings that were the least disappointing. So many times I feel like I have attended readings by poets whose work I just adore, and then the poet's voice or the way they read ruins the poems--sometimes the way a poet reads just does their poems a complete disservice, and though I still love the poems I feel really disappointed. So that is why in order to answer your question I am in part thinking in terms of least disappointing... But actually I can think of two readings that I saw in the last couple years that I really loved and that were really important to me. The first one would be a reading by Jim Galvin, from his book X--I was already a J.G. fan but had not yet read that book, and from the moment he finished reading the first poem in the book, "Little Dantesque," my head was a hive. Here is a little more than the first stanza:

It turns out
The dogs were in control all along.

Hard by the hinges of Hell--
A faculty party.

Everyone drifts
in their disastrous bodies.

Sudden furniture,
A hint of eucalyptus.

Someone plugs in the flowers.

1.

I've been a has-been.
Now I'm a was. I was
Promoted.

*********************************

I guess I partly love that reading best because it introduced me to this book, X, which I still can't get over, which lives in that stack of books on the desk that goes with me anywhere I'm going longer than a month. The books you really live with. I think it's the best book of poetry I've read for years and years.

**********************************

I really loved a reading I saw that was part of a DVD series I can't recall the name of, in which Kevin Davies participated, and I remember thinking his reading--and his way of talking about writing, too--was every bit as funny, smart, searing, and beautiful as his book Comp., which also lives in that little stack of books I just mentioned. Another book I never got over.

*********************************

I'd really love to attend a reading by Anne Carson.

*********************************

Thanks for all the time, thought, and energy you put in here at Harriet. Bon courage!

Posted by: ashley on September 2, 2008 9:25 PM

Anne Carson will be reading in Chicago for the Poetry Foundation on November 1st; details here!

Posted by: Don Share on September 3, 2008 9:07 AM

Thanks, Ashley. Discovering new poets and poetries has been the most rewarding aspect of Harriet for me as well. I appreciate the time you spent reading my posts.

Posted by: Alan Gilbert on September 4, 2008 12:35 PM

I am still kicking myself for losing the name of young man I saw read in town...

Open mics - are like car grills on which are smashed the regular bugs and sometimes, an exotic one, but it's dead..lost to the wind.

Posted by: Jane on September 8, 2008 4:44 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Your name and a valid e-mail address are required. Thanks for waiting.)



CONTRIBUTING WRITERS
Wanda Coleman
Olena Kalytiak Davis
Forrest Gander
Lavinia Greenlaw
Javier Huerta
Travis Nichols

STAFF WRITERS
Michael Marcinkowski
Fred Sasaki
Don Share
Elizabeth Stigler
Nick Twemlow
Emily Warn

PREVIOUS WRITERS
Christian Bök
Stephen Burt
Kwame Dawes
Linh Dinh
Daisy Fried
Alan Gilbert
Kenneth Goldsmith
Rigoberto González
Major Jackson
Ada Limón
Jeffrey McDaniel
Ange Mlinko
Mark Nowak
Lucia Perillo
D.A. Powell
Reginald Shepherd
Patricia Smith
A.E. Stallings
Rachel Zucker

RECENT COMMENTS
Political Poetry: An Epistolary Conversation (5)
Hayden Carruth (1921-2008) (3)
Empire in Funkville (7)
¡Maldición! (3)
Read the foreign and the dead (3)

RECENT POSTS
Hayden Carruth (1921-2008) (Emily Warn)
Read the foreign and the dead (Lavinia Greenlaw)
O LITERATI, GET UP! (Olena Kalytiak Davis)
POETRY + MUSIC = INSPIRATION? (Wanda Coleman)
Into the Mouths of Volcanoes (Forrest Gander)

CATEGORY ARCHIVE
Poetry magazine
AWP
Arts
Awards
Biography
Books
Criticism
Distribution
Education
Film
International
Language
Music
News
Obituaries
Outrageous
Photographs
Poems
Poetry Out Loud
Poetry and the Internet
Politics
Readings
TV
Translation
poetryfoundation.org

AUTHOR ARCHIVES
Christian Bök
Stephen Burt
Wanda Coleman
Olena Kalytiak Davis
Kwame Dawes
Linh Dinh
Daisy Fried
Forrest Gander
Alan Gilbert
Kenneth Goldsmith
Rigoberto González
Lavinia Greenlaw
Javier Huerta
Major Jackson
Ada Limón
Jeffrey McDaniel
Ange Mlinko
Travis Nichols
Mark Nowak
Ed Park
Lucia Perillo
D.A. Powell
Fred Sasaki
Don Share
Reginald Shepherd
Patricia Smith
A.E. Stallings
Elizabeth Stigler
Nick Twemlow
Emily Warn
Rachel Zucker

Subscribe to the RSS feed.
What is RSS?

Poetry Tool






OR SEARCH
Events
Art Beyond Borders
Eamon Grennan




Fullerton Hall
Art Institute of Chicago
111 South Michigan Avenue
Thursday, January 15
Free admission

More

Email Sign Up
Sign up for updates from the Poetry Foundation. Click here to learn more, or enter your email address to sign up!