|
|
|
Daisy Fried
Vitriol in the Arts
Always glad to see August Kleinzahler, one of the best poets writing today, get some press. Reporters for mainstream papers who write about AK seem to like to ask Billy Collins for a quote about him. In the LA Times recently, BC remarked, on AK’s attacks on the poetry establishment: “All the vitriol…I don’t get it.” Which makes me ask a question of my own: Billy—No vitriol? I don’t get it. CommentsThat photograph isn't Shatner-- and it's not Billy Collins. Frankly I'm not sure why Kleinzahler wants, or once wanted, to spend time attacking Billy Collins, or attacking Garrison Keillor either-- Keillor's taste in poetry sure isn't mine, but Keillor seems to me to do more good than harm. I like Kleinzahler's poetry almost limitlessly, as some of you already know, but "why the vitriol" isn't a bad question: its possible answers say something, maybe something profound, about how Kleinzahler's tastes, and his mind, work right now. I think he needs the vitriol for the poems. (And his latest poems-- Kleinzahler's, I mean-- are some of his best.) Was anyone unclear about who's in the photograph? It's not as good, though, as the one on the jacket of Sleeping It off in Rapid City, my vote for book of the year. As for vitriol, asking "why" might indeed lead to interesting avenues if taken seriously, but I don't get the sense Collins is really interested in answers. He just wants everyone to get along. It would make for a quirky, but certainly popular collection: Donnish Donneybrooks: An Book of Anecdotes about Duels, Fistfights, and Larger Melees Between Poets (or between Poets and Critics), from Antiquity to the Present. Something tells me these incidents may be more common than most people think. I probably shouldn't say it, but I sometimes myself have wanted, and come close to... well, no, I won't say it, forget it. Anyway, does anyone want to edit this book with me? Maybe we could cut it down a bit, and start, say, with Robert Creeley in Bolinas. Kent Steve, the contemporary poems on Writer's Almanac tend to be pretty one-dimensional. Keillor makes it sound like church -- reverent, life-affirming. (Actually, the typical Bible reading is rather more bracing.) Kleinzahler's just matching vitriol for vitriol. I've read some nasty comments about Kay Ryan re her AWP essay. Who are these commenters? What stake do they have in the circus routines that have grown up around poetry, from conferences to National Poetry Month to "the poetry bus" et al.? Sleeping It Off in Rapid City is one of my favorite books this year, too. But there's a certain wisdom in warning the wrong people to fuck off. At a time when so many poets just want to move product, A.K. demands a more discerning audience. I take heart from it.
Carl Sandburg is known today as the author of two poems -- "Chicago" and "Fog" -- but, much as I love his poetry (far beyond the schoolroom anthology standards), his most enduring legacy is probably his 1927 collection of folk songs, "The American Songbag." Not only is the bag stuffed full of songs that people still know and sing -- the list is long -- but Sandburg's editorial apparatus is charming, energetic, knowledgeable -- and was hugely influential on the styles and personae of Woody Guthrie and Pete Seeger -- in other words, on Folk Music As We Know It, as well as, indirectly, on Bob Dylan, or, Rock Music As We Know It. In addition, the founders of Slam acknowledge Sandburg as not only a Chicago but also a presentational forebear -- the guy is in the culture. I'm bothering with this because when Sandburg's publisher reissued the Songbag in 1990, they hired Garrison Keillor to write a new introduction, and he devotes most of the introduction to disparaging Sandburg -- which is a sick publishing strategy -- hire a famous name to knock your product down a few pegs. Keillor can be funny, but he and poetry don't get along. I've even been tempted to get vitriolic about it. Keillor has edited/published what, two anthologies, and one of your columnists there, Shepherd, he has also done two anthologies—— now which of these editors has reached the most readers with his selections? And if you say that readership is not a valid criterion of well, Mr. and Ms. Po(Chi)Mag, why, then, why You can't have it both ways . . . unless maybe you should run two lists: . . .
Sure you can have it both ways. It's just easier to determine which books sell than it is which books are best. Someone should dig up the best-selling poetry books of, say, 1950, and see what from that list we'd recognize today. And surely there's also room in this vast poetry nation to have both Shepherd and Keillor and, for that matter, Bill Knott doing their various things in their different ways. This all reminds me of Mr Blake's nursery rhyme: The sow came in with the saddle, Bill Knott said, >i also think Collins is one of the best . . .
Kent I've never met Billy Collins, but once I had a dream about him. We were sitting side by side, in a kind of capsule attached to a long metal arm. And the capsule began to spin faster and faster, until my face deformed with the pressure, and I screamed for them to let me out of the capsule. I looked over at Billy Collins, whose face had now become the lovely face of Ingrid Bergman in the movie Casablanca, and he/she just gazed at me, serene, through a soft filtered hue. And I screamed and screamed until my skull, of a sudden, collapsed like an egg shell, into a brownish dust. So now you see: You've been dead for three billion years, said Billy in her husky voice. And then I woke up. I've never understood why we should applaud if someone pays attention to poetry, using some media platform to bring it to the unwashed masses -- except in Keillor's case, it's the liberal middlebrow NPR set he's bringing it to. Why does an interest in poetry (a love for poetry, a passion for poetry) entail an interest in attracting a wide audience for it? This isn't a question about "dumbing it down" by the way. I think Garrison Keillor is an idiot, but I'd have the same question if we were talking about Noam Chomsky. Meanwhile, it's clear that Henry's not a Hold Steady fan. * i wouldn't crawl or kneel or you'll frown how middlebrow |
CONTRIBUTING WRITERS
Wanda ColemanOlena Kalytiak Davis Forrest Gander Lavinia Greenlaw Javier Huerta Travis Nichols STAFF WRITERS
Michael MarcinkowskiFred Sasaki Don Share Elizabeth Stigler Nick Twemlow Emily Warn PREVIOUS WRITERS
Christian BökStephen Burt Kwame Dawes Linh Dinh Daisy Fried Alan Gilbert Kenneth Goldsmith Rigoberto González Major Jackson Ada Limón Jeffrey McDaniel Ange Mlinko Mark Nowak Lucia Perillo D.A. Powell Reginald Shepherd Patricia Smith A.E. Stallings Rachel Zucker RECENT COMMENTS
Political Poetry: An Epistolary Conversation (5)Hayden Carruth (1921-2008) (3) Empire in Funkville (7) ¡Maldición! (3) Read the foreign and the dead (3) RECENT POSTS
Hayden Carruth (1921-2008) (Emily Warn)Read the foreign and the dead (Lavinia Greenlaw) O LITERATI, GET UP! (Olena Kalytiak Davis) POETRY + MUSIC = INSPIRATION? (Wanda Coleman) Into the Mouths of Volcanoes (Forrest Gander) CATEGORY ARCHIVE
Poetry magazineAWP Arts Awards Biography Books Criticism Distribution Education Film International Language Music News Obituaries Outrageous Photographs Poems Poetry Out Loud Poetry and the Internet Politics Readings TV Translation poetryfoundation.org AUTHOR ARCHIVES
Christian BökStephen Burt Wanda Coleman Olena Kalytiak Davis Kwame Dawes Linh Dinh Daisy Fried Forrest Gander Alan Gilbert Kenneth Goldsmith Rigoberto González Lavinia Greenlaw Javier Huerta Major Jackson Ada Limón Jeffrey McDaniel Ange Mlinko Travis Nichols Mark Nowak Ed Park Lucia Perillo D.A. Powell Fred Sasaki Don Share Reginald Shepherd Patricia Smith A.E. Stallings Elizabeth Stigler Nick Twemlow Emily Warn Rachel Zucker Subscribe to the RSS feed. ![]() What is RSS? |

54th Annual Poetry Day: Louise Glück
