Wild Tongue
the Platonic idea
is “not only beauty, truth, and goodness,” but “the heavenly
bed, created by God … a heavenly man, a heavenly
dog, a heavenly cat, and so on …”
Bertrand Russell
We’re not all lesbians at this bar and grill (not yet?
not practicing? only in heart?), chiaroscuro as the room is
with expensive ambiance and dear cuts of meat
and fish overlaid with nouveau fruit sauce, it’s clear
that the most manly woman among us, older,
wearing cowboy boots and a turquoise bolo,
is probably neither entirely straight nor wholly
queer. When she begins to confess her ‘secret’—
it’s her holding of a piece of land, acres
of sweet desert; its muddy roads, its remote
sublime have four-wheeled deep into her being.
She’s probably someone’s heavenly grandmother,
as I’m still someone’s heavenly wife, despite
the separation. Appearance does not really appear,
but it appears to appear, yet, for a moment, it seems
our conversation may open up unexpectedly
or shatter into awkwardness over the word
girlfriends: who in the rainy summers
of our youths, we all played with our girlfriends,
(what do I mean by ‘girlfriend?’ what do you
mean by yours?) It’s only then, as one of the younger
women (the most lovely, so silver with bracelets
and earrings and a noticeable ring) laughs
that I begin to guess her inclination, Does it really
appear to appear, or only apparently appear
to appear? It’s a long way from Plato’s symposium
to this bar and grill in Arizona. At that ancient feast—
whenever a number of individuals have a common name,
they have also a common ‘idea’ or ‘form’—only
men reclined upon the couches, and the only the love
of man for man was love’s ideal, the impulse
toward some boyish form becoming the ascension
of being to some ever truer realm, as the souls
of men became pregnant and gave birth to
“not only beauty, truth, and goodness,” but
“the heavenly bed, created by God… a heavenly man,
a heavenly dog, a heavenly cat, and so on through
a whole Noah’s ark,” but no heavenly woman, much less
a heavenly lesbian, for since Aristotle, “Lesbian rule”
has meant that measure made of lead so it could be bent
to a curved or crooked wall. Because we are all women,
how can we speak of love? In the beginning, banished
from the realm of discourse, assigned to love’s servitude
not its speech, to be love’s body not its tongue,
so no one here speaks of her feeling, much less thinks
to make it another’s measure. In our mouths, the tongue’s
a knife, each word a wild edge, where we stammer
only our own wound, a drop of blood sensual
on the tongue, a distinctive taste of salt, more
mollusk perhaps—wrapped around an I of sand—
than pearl, a syllable of milk or nipple, some
private body within the body, the you behind
your eyes, as if being itself were poetry—passionate
with nascent and protean neologism, full of the gaps
of being, the oblique richness of a depth in which we
begin to glimpse each other, mysterious and solo
as we are, black stubborn pearls of being.
If we spoke of Plato, and we don’t; each of us
was banished from the womb by virtue
of having a womb, to this unpredictable realm
where each of us would have to discover
her self, that wild tongue—never delineated,
even in shadow, upon the philosopher’s cave wall.
Copyright Credit: Rebecca Seiferle, "Wild Tongue" from Wild Tongue. Copyright © 2007 by Rebecca Seiferle. Reprinted by permission of Copper Canyon Press, www.coppercanyonpress.org.
Source: Wild Tongue (Copper Canyon Press, 2007)