On Self-Pity: Go Eat Worms
![Various expressive faces, in frames, against a light blue background.](https://cdn-test.poetryfoundation.org/cdn-cgi/image/w=10,h=10,q=50,blur=3/content/images/fb2e68b382607ea6a7002b2dac93ab35dc89233b.jpg)
I like to ask people if they have a hyperbolic self-pity phrase they repeat to themselves for pleasure and comfort. One writer told me his phrase is, “You’re minor.” Another said, “For me it’s always ‘I wanna go home’ even when I’m already home.” My personal go-to is, “Nothing good ever happens to me.” This little sad-sack mantra really does seem to help. It makes my suffering theatrical. Children love screaming when nothing is wrong because something has been wrong, something will be wrong—don’t worry about the timing, just get your catharsis in when you can.
The logical leap between “Nobody likes me, everybody hates me” and “Guess I’ll go eat worms” is something I have thought about a lot. What impulse is being served? Does the speaker of these lyrics think worms are delicious (“big, fat juicy ones”)? Is it a bid for attention—is it supposed to make his enemies feel bad for him? Do the worms get you high? I go back and forth on whether the song is supposed to evoke death, the worms of the grave. But don’t the worms eat you? I think the worms are ultimately literal, a form of self-punishment. I think of Jude, in my favorite scene in Jude the Obscure, who feels so low he jumps up and down in the center of an iced-over pond hoping to fall in and drown. The ice cracks but doesn’t give, so Jude supposes he is “not a sufficiently dignified person for suicide.” What options now—what is even “less noble” than “self-extermination”? He decides to get drunk.
Bugs are useful figures in the literature of self-pity—bugs, that catchall category that includes insects and spiders and things with a thousand legs, any loathsome, creepy creature that dwells in the dirt under rocks or the slime of a drain. I once heard, anecdotally, not from an entomologist or anything, that stink bugs, an invasive species with “long, piercing-sucking mouth parts” as one pest management handbook puts it, are notorious for hanging out in spots where they are likely to get smashed and killed, such as a doorframe. Recently my husband found one perched on the edge of a tissue poking up from its box. “That’s convenient,” he said, using said tissue to crush it, then throwing the wad in the toilet. How Jude-like, these stink bugs. They must know they are stink bugs: a Kafkaesque nightmare.
My father-in-law’s mother was an elegant, strong-willed, opinionated woman who lived to almost one hundred. Once, in her nineties, Vivian came over for dinner, and we noted that she was looking well. “Don’t say that,” she said, and added in a tone I will never forget: “I want people to feel sorry for me.” She probably hadn’t gotten much pity in her life, not having offered much to others. Maybe, at the end of life, the shame around pity drops away. Thomas Hardy was seventy-seven when “Afterwards” was published, a beautiful but mildly embarrassing poem that dares to wonder how, and how much, he’ll be spoken of after he’s gone:
If, when hearing that I have been stilled at last, they stand at
the door,
Watching the full-starred heavens that winter sees,
Will this thought rise on those who will meet my face no more,
“He was one who had an eye for such mysteries”?
Maybe Viv’s own mother had not sufficiently pitied her? There’s an idea, in psychoanalysis, that thinking itself is the result of denied or thwarted desire, going back to the frustrations of infancy: you’re hungry; the breast does not appear; thus, thoughts! We soothe ourselves with fantasy, not just of satisfaction but of deeper frustration. We imagine we are starving. We imagine we are dead.
I have noticed a tendency in people, when they’re feeling rather bad, to deliberately make themselves feel worse—to dredge up all their grievances, past and present—as if, to justify bad feelings, they look for very good reasons. As Seamus Heaney writes, in his version of Sophocles’s Philoctetes, “People so deep into/Their own self-pity self-pity buoys them up.” It makes sense, in a way, this strategy—after I feel especially awful, I usually feel a little better. It’s akin to making yourself throw up as a cure for nausea. Self-pity is a strong self-cure. In a way, it is too reliable—you can get too good at self-pity. If it works when things aren’t that bad, it really works when they are bad. Or, you might say, when you most deserve the pity is when it won’t help.
Those who despise self-pity always offer perspective. In his essay “Why Bother?” Jonathan Franzen writes, “How ridiculous the self-pity of the writer in the late twentieth century can seem in light of, say, Herman Melville’s life.” But why should the idea that Herman Melville suffered make us feel better? I must admit, it often does—I’ll read any number of descriptions of Melville’s abject career failures. (Here’s another, via Stephen Marche: “His fate was like the sick joke of some cruel god.”) But why should it? Isn’t that a cruelty on our part? Melville didn’t sacrifice happiness to save us. And why should the idea that things could be worse help? Things could be worse may be one of those lies that allows us to live, obscuring the truer truth: Things will be worse. You may not have the worst life possible, but your own, specific life will contain more suffering than it does now. And you’re the one who will have to feel it.
This essay is part of “Hard Feelings,” an essay series of poets writing about ugly emotions.
Elisa Gabbert is the author of six collections of poetry and essays including Normal Distance (Soft Skull Press, 2022), The Unreality of Memory (FSG, 2020), and The Word Pretty (Black Ocean, 2018). She writes a regular poetry column for the New York Times, and her writing has appeared in the New York Review of Books, Harper’s, A Public Space, American Poetry Review, New England Review, and elsewhere...